The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on Wednesday told a Federal High Court, Abuja that the action of former Senate President Bukoka Saraki has been hindering the agency from probing him.
EFCC counsel Chile Okoronkwo made this known to Justice Anwuli Chikere when the fundamental rights enforcement suits filed by Saraki were mentioned in the court.
The EFCC had, in 2019, said it would probe Saraki’s earnings between 2003 and 2011 when he was governor of Kwara.
The commission was reported to have seized some of his houses in the Ikoyi area of Lagos at the time.
However, on May 10, 2019 Saraki filed two separate suits marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/507/19 and FHC/ABJ/CS/508/19 respectively before Justice Taiwo Taiwo to challenge the action of the EFCC.
Justice Taiwo, who was the presiding judge, ruled on an ex parte application filed along with the substantive suits and ordered the anti-corruption agency (fourth respondent) and the other five respondents to the suits to stay action on the probe pending the hearing and determination of the motion on notice filed by the applicant.
The order was granted after Sunday Onubi, Saraki’s lawyer, moved the application, on May 14, 2019.
The court had directed the parties to maintain the status quo by suspending the probe. But the EFCC later applied that the judge should recuse himself and the matter be transfered to another court.
Justice Taiwo sent back the case file to the chief judge and the matter was reassigned to Justice Chikere for adjudication.
When the matter was called on Wednesday, counsel to the ex-senate president, Sunday Onubi, told the court that the matter was slated for mention.
However, the EFCC’s Lawyer, Okoronkwo, informed the court that he had an application to make.
The lawyer briefed the court that on May 14, 2019, a sister court, presided over by Justice Taiwo, made an order “directing all respondents to stay off action in connection with the subject matter of the suit pending the hearing and determination of the substantive suit.”
He said though there was no doubt that the order was made by the court, “it has hindered the 4th respondent from performing its duty for about two years now.”
Okoronkwo, who stated that Saraki continued to hinge on the order of the court any time he is invited, urged the court to vacate the order.
The judge, noting that the court vacation was around the corner, adjourned the matter until October 7 for hearing.
